Synthesis of free-standing Ga2O3 films for flexible devices by water etching of Sr3Al2O6 sacrificial layers
Wang Xia1, 2, Wu Zhen-Ping1, 2, Cui Wei1, 2, Zhi Yu-Song1, 2, Li Zhi-Peng3, Li Pei-Gang1, 2, Guo Dao-You4, Tang Wei-Hua1, 2, †
Laboratory of Information Functional Materials and Devices, School of Science, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
State Key Laboratory of Information Photonics and Optical Communications, Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications, Beijing 100876, China
School of Materials Science and Engineering, University of Science and Technology Beijing, Beijing 100876, China
Center for Optoelectronics Materials and Devices, Department of Physics, Zhejiang Sci-Tech University, Hangzhou 310018, China

 

† Corresponding author. E-mail: whtang@bupt.edu.cn

Abstract

Flexible electronic devices have attracted much attention due to their practical and commercial value. Integration of thin films with soft substrate is an effective way to fabricate flexible electronic devices. Ga2O3 thin films deposited directly on soft substrates would be amorphous mostly. However, the thickness of the thin film obtained by mechanical exfoliation method is difficult to control and the edge of the film is fragile and easy to be damaged. In this work, we fabricated free-standing Ga2O3 thin films using the water-soluble perovskite Sr3Al2O6 as a sacrificial buffer layer. The obtained Ga2O3 thin films were polycrystalline. The thickness and dimension of the films were controllable. A flexible Ga2O3 solar-blind UV photodetector was fabricated by transferring the free-standing Ga2O3 film on a flexible polyethylene terephthalate substrate. The results displayed that the photoelectric performances of the flexible Ga2O3 photodetector were not sensitive to bending of the device. The free-standing Ga2O3 thin films synthesized through the method described here can be transferred to any substrates or integrated with other thin films to fabricate electronic devices.

1. Introduction

Ga2O3, with a wide band gap of 4.2–5.3 eV, exhibits large breakdown field, high dielectric constant and Baligaʼs figure of merit.[14] Meanwhile, Ga2O3 can work steadily in extreme environment, such as high temperature, high electric field, and high energy radiation. Ga2O3 with such properties has a wide range of potential applications in high-power electronic devices, deep ultraviolet (DUV) solar-blind photodetectors, gas sensors, and transparent electrodes on optoelectronic devices.[513] Ga2O3 Schottky barrier diodes have a high breakdown voltage.[14] The β-Ga2O3 field-effect transistors (FETs) exhibits a large on/off current rations ( ).[15] Rectifiers and enhancement-mode FETs based on Ga2O3 can be used under higher electric field than either SiC or GaN based devices.[16] DUV solar blind photodetectors have important civil and military applications, such as missile tracking, short-range secure communication, ultraviolet astronomy, ozone holes monitoring, corona detection, and so on.[1720]

Bendable, lightweight, flexible, sensitive, and wearable, electronic devices are urgently needed in emerging technological applications.[2124] Flexible and transparent two-dimensional (2D) materials have been employed and developed in electronic technologies, including wearable energy-harvesting systems, folding electronic devices, curved screen electronic devices, soft portable devices, and rollup displays flexible Ga2O3 thin film photodetectors.[17] The Ga2O3 thin film layer deposited directly on the flexible polymer materials was non-crystalline, and the amorphous films were unstable for long-term device applications.[2530] The Ga2O3 thin film layer can be fabricated by integrating exfoliated Ga2O3 micro-layers,[31] but the thicknesses and dimensions of the Ga2O3 film layer were uncontrollable with the mechanical exfoliation method. In addition, the edge of the film is not intact.

In this paper, a millimeter sized (5 mm ×8 mm) free-standing Ga2O3 thin film was synthesized, and the flexible Ga2O3 solar-blind UV photodetector was fabricated. The Ga2O3 thin film layer transferred to the flexible substrates in this research was crystalline and its thickness was controllable. In addition, the edge of the film was intact. The experimental results demonstrated that the bending of the film had no obvious influence on its electrical performance. This provides an effective transfer method to fabricate crystalline Ga2O3 thin film onto flexible substrates for applications in flexible and wearable electronics.

2. Experimental

The SAO buffer layer (BL) was deposited on silicon substrates by radio frequency (RF) magnetron sputtering, and then Ga2O3 thin film was grown on the SAO BL. The base pressure in chamber was 1×10−4 Pa, and the distance between SAO target (99.99% purity) and substrates was 6 cm. The substrates temperatures were 750 °C. The Sr3Al2O6 (SAO)[32,33] BL was deposited under a working pressure of 0.4 Pa and RF power of 120 W. The Ga2O3 thin film was deposited under a working pressure of 0.8 Pa and RF power of 70 W. Then the Ga2O3/SAO bilayer thin films on the Si substrates was immersed into deionized water. The crystal Ga2O3 thin film separated from substrates when SAO film was etched in water.[31,33] Finally, the free-standing Ga2O3 thin film was transferred to the flexible substrates polyethylene terephthalate (PET). The crystal structure of the as-grown film was investigated by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). UV-visible (UV-vis) absorption spectrum was taken using Hitachi U-3900 UV-vis spectrophotometer. The current–voltage (IV) of the Ga2O3 film-based detectors were measured by Keithely 2450 source meter. To test the electric properties of the flexible Ga2O3 film, interdigital Ti/Au electrodes were deposited on the film by radio frequency magnetron sputtering using shadow mask. The electrode fingers of shadow mask were wide and long with a spacing gap.

3. Results and discussion

Figure 1(a) is the flow chart of the process to fabricate free-standing Ga2O3 films on PET. Figure 1(b) shows the photograph of free-standing Ga2O3 thin film floating on the surface of the deionized water. A millimeter sized (5 mm ×8 mm) free-standing Ga2O3 thin film was obtained. Figure 1(c) is the optical microscope image of free-standing Ga2O3 thin film in the water, and it appeared that the edge of film is intact. The free-standing Ga2O3 thin film can be transferred to any substrates. A photograph of Ga2O membrane transferred onto the flexible PET is shown in Fig. 1(d).

Fig. 1. (a) Schematics of the free-standing Ga2O thin film fabrication process. (b) Photograph of the free-standing thin film on the surface of the water. (c) An optical microscope image of the edge of free-standing Ga2O3 thin film. (d) An image of the device fabricated by transferring free-standing Ga2O3 film onto the PET substrates.

Figure 2(a) shows the structure and morphology of the Ga2O3 thin film characterized by transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The high-resolution TEM (HRTEM) image shows that the Ga2O3 thin film was polycrystalline. The polycrystalline structure was further confirmed by selected area electron diffraction (SAED) pattern in the illustration. Figure 2(b) shows the top SEM morphologies of the Ga2O3 thin film. It is obvious that the film was dense. The grain size of film was about dozens of nanometers. Figure 2(c) gives the ultraviolet–visible (UV) absorbance spectrum of the free-standing Ga2O3 thin film. The spectrum of the measured sample exhibits a sharp absorption edge at wavelength of ∼260 nm. The band gap of β-Ga2O3 thin film is about 4.75 eV obtained by fitting the extrapolating linear region. The plot (ahv)2 versus hv is shown in the inset of Fig. 2(c), where h is Planckʼs constant, a is the absorption coefficient, and v is the frequency of the incident photon. Figure 2(d) shows the XPS spectrum with the binding energy in range from 1111 eV to 1155 eV. The energy peak of Ga 2p1/2 and Ga 2p3/2 are centered, which is attributed to the presence of gallium oxide and not gallium metal or others.

Fig. 2. (a) The HRTEM image of Ga2O3 thin film; inset: the corresponding SAED pattern. (b) The top surface view SEM image. (c) The UV absorbance spectrum of Ga2O3 thin film. (d) XPS spectra of Ga 2p core levels.

To investigate photoelectric properties of the film, flexible Ga2O3 based solar-blind UV photodetector was fabricated and a three-pair interdigital Ti/Au electrodes were deposited on top of the β-Ga2O3 thin film to construct a MSM structure device. The thickness of Ti layer and Au layer were 30 nm and 100 nm, respectively. The electrode fingers were wide, long, spacing gap, and 3 pair fingers. The 365 nm and 254 nm wavelength were used as light sources, respectively. The effective irradiated area was ∼0.03 cm2. A lamp with a center wavelength of 254 nm and 365 nm was used as a UV illumination source. In Fig. 3(a), IV curve measured under the 365 nm light (0.5 mW/cm2 intensity level on the sample surface) does not show significant difference to the IV curve measured in dark, which suggests that the Ga2O3 thin film was not sensitive to 365 nm light. In contrast, the current shown a sharp jump when the device was exposed to 254 nm light. Figure 3(b) displays the IV curves of the Ga2O3 film under rigid, bending upward and bending downward states. The curved Ga2O3 film was considered to be on a circumference of radius r, whose value implies the degree of bending. The curvature degree of Ga2O3 film were , r = 5 mm, and r = −5 mm, respectively. Seen from Fig. 3(b), the Ga2O3 thin film exhibits almost the same electrical performance on the flexible PET, whether or not the film was bending. This implies that bending stress and bending direction had no influence on electrical performance of the films. The ignorable difference in these curves may be ascribed to the contact conditions between the Ga2O3 thin film and the electrodes. The insets shows the photographs of the flexible Ga2O3 thin film in the case of rigidity, bending upward and bending downward, respectively.

Fig. 3. IV characteristics curves: (a) at different light intensity; (b) under the states of the rigid, bend upward, and bend downward. The insets show the photographs of the flexible Ga2O3 thin film at the rigid, bend upward, and bend downward. Time-dependent photoresponse: (c) experimental curve and fitted curve of the current rise and decay process to 254 nm illuminations under the state of rigid. (d) The It curve under 254 nm light illumination.

Figure 3(c) shows the time-dependent photoresponse performance of flexible Ga2O3 thin film under the case of rigid. The Ga2O3 thin film was tested under 254 nm light by on/off switching and with an applied bias of 5 V. The intensity level of 254 nm illumination source on the sample surface was 1 mW/cm2. The results displayed a good repeatability, lower dark current and high photo-conductivity of the free-standing Ga2O3 film based device. The flexible Ga2O3 film based device yields a high level of signal-to-noise ratio under DUV illumination. Moreover, the device shows a short rise time and fall time under 5 V bias voltage. The quantitative analysis of the current rise and decay process involves the fitting of the photo-response curve with a exponential relaxation equation:[33]

where I 0 is the steady state photocurrent, t is the time, A is constant, and τ is a relaxation time constant. In Fig. 3(c), the photoresponse processes are well fitted. τ r and τ d are the time constants for the rise edge and decay edges, respectively. For the device, the current rise and fall time are estimated to be and . There are many reported results about Ga2O3 film based devices, and the response speed was in the range of 94.83 s[1]–1.5 ms.[19] The response speed of the device based on free-standing Ga2O3 film was faster than some reported results,[3436] demonstrating its potential applications in optoelectronic device fabrication. Figure 3(d) shows the It photoresponse stability under illuminations of 254 nm light. With an incident light wavelength of 254 nm and an applied bias of 5 V, we found that the photoresponsivity of the photoelectric detector was 5×10−4 A/W. The light/dark current ratio of the photoelectric detector was approximately 100 with the 254 nm light intensity of 1 mW/cm2. With the same growth parameters, the Ga2O3 film prepared directly on the Al2O3 substrate has better performance. The photoresponse of the prepared photodetector is 0.3 A/W[37] and dark current ratio is 16000.[38] There are some possible reasons that affect the performance of the device, e.g., the quality of film, the interface state of film/substrate, and the surface state of film. However, further study is necessary to improve the performance of free-standing Ga2O3 thin films based optoelectronic device.

4. Conclusion

In summary, a free-standing Ga2O3 thin film has been fabricated using Sr3Al2O6 as a sacrificial layer. The free-standing Ga2O3 thin film was polycrystalline, thickness was controllable, and the film edge was intact. Additionally, the photoelectric performances testing of the flexible Ga2O3 photodetector showed that the free-standing Ga2O3 thin film had a similar electrical performance whether bending or not, meaning no degradation after bending. The experimental results demonstrated that it was a practical way to fabricate free-standing Ga2O3 thin films by using Sr3Al2O6 as a sacrificial layer. The free-standing Ga2O3 film can be used to fabricate flexible and wearable electronic devices by transferring it to flexible substrates for application.

Reference
[1] Kong W Y Wu G A Wang K Y Zhang T F Zou Y F Wang D D Luo L B 2016 Ad. Mater. 28 10725
[2] Zhao B Wang F Chen H Wang Y Jiang M Fang X Zhao D 2015 Nano Let. 15 3988
[3] Kokubun Y Miura K Endo F Nakagomi S 2007 Appl. Phy. Let. 90 031912
[4] Bilodeau R A Zemlyanov D Y Kramer R K 2017 Adv. Mater. Interfaces 4 1600913
[5] Cui S J Mei Z X Hou Y N Chen Q S Liang H L Zhang Y H Huo W X Du X L 2018 Chin. Phys. 27 067301
[6] Bhachu D S Scanlon D O Sankar G Veal T D Egdell R G Cibin G Dent A J Knapp C E Carmalt C J Parkin I P 2015 Chem. Mater. 27 2788
[7] Manandhar S Ramana C V 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 61902
[8] Guo D Y Wu Z P An Y H Guo X C Chu X L Sun C L Li L Li P G Tang W H 2014 Appl. Phys. Lett. 105 023507
[9] Guo D Y Wu Z P Li P G An Y H Liu H Guo X C Yan H Wang G F Sun C L Li L H Tang W H 2014 Opt. Mater. Express 4 1067
[10] Higashiwaki M Sasaki K Murakami H Kumagai Y Koukitu A Kuramata A Masui T Yamakosh S 2016 Semicond. Sci. Technol. 31 034001
[11] An Y H Zhi Y S Cui W Zhao X L Wu Z P Guo D Y Li P G Tang W H 2016 Appl. Phs. A-mater. 122 1036
[12] Kim M Seo J H Singisetti U Ma Z 2017 J. Mater. Chem. 5 8338
[13] Higashiwaki M Kuramata A Murakami H Kumagai Y 2017 J. Phys. D: Appl. Phys. 50 333002
[14] Konishi K Goto K Murakami H Kumagai Y Kuramata A Yamakoshi S Higashiwaki M 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 110 103506
[15] Zhou H Si M Alghamdi S Qiu G Yang L Ye P D 2017 IEEE Electron Device Lett. 38 103
[16] Zhou H Maize K Qiu G Shakouri A Ye P D 2017 Appl. Phys. Lett. 111 092102
[17] Hou X Liu B Wang X Wang Z Wang Q Chen D Shen G 2013 Nanoscale 5 7831
[18] Oh S Kim C K Kim J 2018 ACS Photonics 5 1123
[19] Lin R C Zheng W Zhang D Zhang Z J Liao Q X Yang L Huang H 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. & Inter. 10 22419
[20] Liu X Z Yue C Xia C T Zhang W L 2016 Chin. Phys. 25 017201
[21] Xiong Z N Xiu X Q Li Y W Hua X M Xie Z L Chen P Liu B Han P Zhang R Zheng Y D 2018 Chin. Phys. Lett. 35 058101
[22] Zhu H L Fang Z Q Preston C Li Y Y Hu L B 2014 Energy & Environmental Science 7 269
[23] Yao B Huang L Zhang J Gao X Wu J Cheng Y Xiao X Wang B Li Y Zhou J 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 6353
[24] Jin J Lee D Im H G Han Y C Jeong E G Rolandi M Choi K C Bae B S 2016 Adv. Mater. 28 5141
[25] Zhang Y Mei Z Cui S Liang H Liu Y Du X 2016 Adv. Electron. Mater. 2 1500486
[26] Cui S J Mei X Zhang Y H Liang L Du L 2017 Adv. Opt. Mater. 5 1700454
[27] Lu S Qi J Liu S Zhang Z Wang Z Lin P Liao Q Liang Q Zhang Y 2014 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 6 14116
[28] Hu P Wang L Yoon M Zhang J Feng W Wang X Wen Z Idrobo J C Miyamoto Y Geohegan D B Xiao K 2013 Nano Lett. 13 1649
[29] Shrestha N K Bui H T Lee T Noh Y Y 2018 Langmuir 34 4575
[30] Liu C P Ho C Y Dosreis R Foo Y Guo P F Zapien J A Walukiewicz W Yu K M 2018 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 10 7239
[31] Liu N Fang G Zeng W Zhou H Cheng F Zheng Q Yuan L Zou X Zhao X 2010 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 2 1973
[32] Lu Baek D Hong S Kourkoutis L Hikita Hwan H 2016 Nat. Mater. 15 1255
[33] Baek D L Hikita A Hwan H Kourkoutis L F 2017 ACS Appl. Mater. Interfaces 9 54
[34] Yang C Liang H W Zhang Z Z Xia X C Tao P C Chen Y P Zhang H Q Shen R S Luo Y M Du G T 2018 RSC Adv. 8 6341
[35] Alema F Hertog B Ledyaev O Volovik D Thoma G Miller R Osinsky A Mukhopadhyay P Bakhshi S Ali H Schoenfeld W V 2017 Phys. Status Solidi 214 1600688
[36] Kong W Y Wu G A Wang K Y Zhang T F Zou Y F Wang D D Luo L B 2016 Application Adv. Mater. 28 10725
[37] Peng Y K Zhang Y Chen Z W Guo D Y Zhang X Li P G Wu Z P Tang W H 2018 IEEE Photon. Technol. Lett. 30 993
[38] Wang X Chen Z W Guo D Y Zhang X Wu Z P Li P G Tang W H 2018 Opt. Mater. Express 8 2918